From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 29 07:18:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C5016A4CE for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 07:18:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from hak.cnd.mcgill.ca (hak.cnd.mcgill.ca [132.216.11.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8197E43D2D for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 07:18:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mat@hak.cnd.mcgill.ca) Received: from hak.cnd.mcgill.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hak.cnd.mcgill.ca (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBTFFP15074424; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:15:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mat@hak.cnd.mcgill.ca) Received: (from mat@localhost) by hak.cnd.mcgill.ca (8.12.9/8.12.8/Submit) id hBTFFPqf074423; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:15:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:15:25 -0500 From: Mathew Kanner To: Brendon and Wendy Message-ID: <20031229151525.GK20827@cnd.mcgill.ca> References: <1072654018.37585.2.camel@bigboot.humphrey.world> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1072654018.37585.2.camel@bigboot.humphrey.world> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: I speak for myself, operating in Montreal, CANADA X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on hak.cnd.mcgill.ca cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB Audio X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 15:18:42 -0000 On Dec 28, Brendon and Wendy wrote: > All, > > I'm interested in getting my USB web camera working under -current. I > see that the uaudio.c (and associated files) are really old relative to > the netbsd ones, and that record capability is missing from the FreeBSD > equivalent files. > > So, my question is would anyone object to me having a go at freshening > the uaudio driver up? Could the audio guys please let me know if this is > totally infeasable? Brendon, Go for it! I presume that you have the hardware to test it. Feel free to ask any qustions (might be better on the -multimedia list), but please keep the dialogue public. Good luck, --Mat -- In general, a standard is very useful, whether it's de facto or du jour. - Microsoft's Greg Sullivan as misquoted by News.Com