From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 14 00:39:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AD7C16A4CE for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:39:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B8743D2D for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:39:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alistair.sutton@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so1577973rnf for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:39:39 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=QaLj2c0Mj22UAqikljMYnLyC34IXghiSuXT7vQp8nYAh2PGqEYqDMXRALtYw3dCPlh/mbclID+wNsNRmvN3tn3h09LbGN6C26KV1PBCEOXKSqgWiMWK9MYA7QJ0RVDPGEvQPl1CdCydpc8Ybw9vxDxYDlDlMzBg05lYk7/41/+w= Received: by 10.38.208.65 with SMTP id f65mr4817936rng; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:32:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.89.32 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:32:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:32:56 +0000 From: Alistair Sutton To: Chuck Robey In-Reply-To: <20050313191932.O74062@april.chuckr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050313191932.O74062@april.chuckr.org> cc: FreeBSD-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libm X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alistair Sutton List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:39:41 -0000 On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:25:15 -0500 (EST), Chuck Robey wrote: > I'm still trying to build gnome-2.10 ... it's broken right now in building > audio/arts. The current error is one that's becoming depressingly > familiar: moc died, it's missing a "libm.so.2". In the past, for all > these kind of errors, I would track down the executable that needed the > old libm, but I am wondering, maybe it wouldn't be all that horrible a > thing, to fake it out? > > Would it work for me, do you think, to have a softlink, from libc to libm? > Woud it hurt anything? (As long as I didn't try to propagate anything that > wanted to use libm!) Would it actually work, solve that dependency > problem? > > Or am I actually, for some reason, really better served by tracking down > the old software and relink it? That's a heck of a lot of extra work, you > understand, right? How are you trying to build gnome 2.10? Are you installing it from scratch or are you upgrading from a previous release using gnome_upgrade.sh? Al -- LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg