From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May  2 14:00:39 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13F916A402
	for <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 May 2007 14:00:39 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bsd782@chrissmith.org)
Received: from alnrmhc15.comcast.net (alnrmhc15.comcast.net [206.18.177.55])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB5F13C448
	for <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 May 2007 14:00:39 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bsd782@chrissmith.org)
Received: from davinci.mw.realcomputerguy.com
	(c-68-61-77-183.hsd1.mi.comcast.net[68.61.77.183])
	by comcast.net (alnrmhc15) with ESMTP
	id <20070502134540b15000rt62e>; Wed, 2 May 2007 13:45:40 +0000
From: Chris Smith <bsd782@chrissmith.org>
To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 09:45:38 -0400
References: <4619226E.1030105@mykitchentable.net>
	<46193097.2040303@mykitchentable.net>
In-Reply-To: <46193097.2040303@mykitchentable.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200705020945.39102.bsd782@chrissmith.org>
Subject: Re: pf and ALTQ - I Don't Understand
X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter
	\(pf\)" <freebsd-pf.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf>,
	<mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf>,
	<mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 14:00:40 -0000

On Sunday 08 April 2007, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
> OK, I've done some more digging and maybe I understand now. =A0I was
> missing the fact that NAT occurs BEFORE filtering

Why not tag the packets?

Chris