From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 19:21:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E051065678; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:21:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, d@delphij.net Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:21:41 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20100623025855.82916.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> <201006231510.50863.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4C225D90.9020100@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <4C225D90.9020100@delphij.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201006231521.43795.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE: WARNING ioctl sign-extension ioctl ffffffff8004667e X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:21:51 -0000 On Wednesday 23 June 2010 03:16 pm, Xin LI wrote: > On 2010/06/23 12:10, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > It is still a kludge and it won't be fixed. :-( > > Another thought - what about just hiding the printf under #ifdef > DIAGNOSTIC... I don't really see any reason why we must print it > out if we truncate it every time... Yes, I agree. Jung-uk Kim