From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 16 19:52:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00EF16A403 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:52:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pobox@verysmall.org) Received: from thing.verysmall.org (thing.verysmall.org [212.100.226.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7886043D45 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:52:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pobox@verysmall.org) Received: from [192.168.2.4] (chello084114134105.3.15.vie.surfer.at [84.114.134.105]) by thing.verysmall.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 638252288E; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 20:51:25 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <450C55FA.5070701@verysmall.org> Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 21:52:26 +0200 From: "pobox@verysmall.org" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob References: <200609161541.38002.bob@tania.servebbs.org> In-Reply-To: <200609161541.38002.bob@tania.servebbs.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When is BuildWorld necessary? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:52:32 -0000 Bob wrote: > Hi: > > I recently installed FreeBSD 6.1 over the net from sources. I am keeping > things up-to-date using CVSup. > > When portaudit tells me I have a security issue; I update/re-install the > affected port. When a kernel patch comes in, I re-compile the kernel; which > now stands at FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6 #3. > > From what I can tell, buildworld re-builds the base system, something I have > yet to do. My thought is to do a buildworld only when the OS version is > updated to the next number above 6.1. I understand this happens at about 4 > month intervals. > > My question is, is there a good reason to buildworld before a version change? > I hate "fixing" something which is working perfectly, and this system has > been stellar! > > Bob Hi Bob, I believe it is basically good to get the 'p' patches as they contain security fixes. My thinking is that if 'p' patch comes out - your system is, in some sense, not perfect anymore :) But I have one question - do you rebuild the world on a remote machine (without physical access) and if yes - how do you restart in single user mode. This is what I can't understand so far. Thanks, Iv --