From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 08:53:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6417616A4CE; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:53:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADA043D2D; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:53:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 6D251530C; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:53:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 8EA2E5309; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:53:33 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 4498533C8E; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:53:33 +0100 (CET) To: bmah@freebsd.org References: <200312100457.hBA4vkO0075658@intruder.kitchenlab.org> <200312101629.hBAGTOO0082138@intruder.kitchenlab.org> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:53:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200312101629.hBAGTOO0082138@intruder.kitchenlab.org> (Bruce A. Mah's message of "Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:29:24 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60 cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: doc/ slush X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:53:50 -0000 bmah@freebsd.org (Bruce A. Mah) writes: > This affects non-committers as well, in that some people who work on > translations aren't committers. The chances of a heads up getting lost in the noise is much higher on -doc than on doc-developers. You should at the very least Bcc: doc-developers on announcements like this. > I generally expect that people who do a serious amount of work in doc/=20 > are also reading the doc@ list. Sure, and src committers read -current, but the code freeze is still announced on developers (though it should really go to src-developers) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no