From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jan 16 17:32:38 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA17908 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 17:32:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from itchy.serv.net (itchy.serv.net [205.153.153.233]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA17903 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 17:32:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from zeno@itchy.serv.net) Received: (from zeno@localhost) by itchy.serv.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA26290 for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 17:32:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 17:32:41 -0800 (PST) From: "Sean T. Lamont .lost." Message-Id: <199901170132.RAA26290@itchy.serv.net> To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: I asked this at one point, got no useful responses Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I need to set up a FreeBSD (or linux) system which will effectively respond to every IP#. The Easiest way I can think of to do this is ifconfig aliases for large blocks of net, but this is prohibitively time-consuming and would probably not work at some point. I messed around a bit with NATD / IPDIVERT to see if I could get something out of it this way, but to no avail. I'm not ruling out the possibility of a kernel hack, though I don't know the tcp/ip code in the kernel well enough now to do so effectively. Anyone have any suggestions? Sean T. Lamont, CTO / Chief NetNerd, Abstract Software, Inc. (ServNet) Seattle - Bellingham - Vancouver - Portland - Everett - Tacoma - Bremerton email: lamont@abstractsoft.com WWW: http://www.serv.net "...There's no moral, it's just a lot of stuff that happens". - H. Simpson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message