From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 19:37:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55DF106564A; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:37:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319F08FC12; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbta17 with SMTP id ta17so1762944obb.13 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:37:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=KXij0YTuK7jwcDz8ACxCxisT0Nmh2uu2giPY+u2O43M=; b=ifWOo2T62Xz+Osb5IsmJBj2F2bMKhlSsLwtl378AoJRVTND0j+xFOLOMHtIYzu68NM 679xyDo3/GrLp4T6cpnJCCIAtbs5cJGnae/nbVsOsCfrao5waKHTJeoPNXkt+xg7/5kj A+cPLuMg/RSC8yxyPtRiN/nrESwpWRrFjcvAY= Received: by 10.50.214.73 with SMTP id ny9mr5826910igc.1.1326397031486; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:37:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from kruse-40.4.ixsystems.com (drawbridge.ixsystems.com. [206.40.55.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 36sm20344413ibc.6.2012.01.12.11.37.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:37:10 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Garrett Cooper In-Reply-To: <1326396803.27040.YahooMailClassic@web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:37:13 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <157C90FE-FB2E-4710-881E-70C47A5C08B9@gmail.com> References: <1326396803.27040.YahooMailClassic@web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> To: pfg@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, John Baldwin , joel@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r229981 - in head/sys: conf dev/sound/pci gnu/dev/sound/pci modules/sound/driver/emu10kx X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:37:12 -0000 On Jan 12, 2012, at 11:33 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hello; >=20 > --- Gio 12/1/12, John Baldwin ha scritto: >=20 >> Da: John Baldwin >> Oggetto: Re: svn commit: r229981 - in head/sys: conf dev/sound/pci = gnu/dev/sound/pci modules/sound/driver/emu10kx >> A: "Pedro F. Giffuni" >> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, = svn-src-head@freebsd.org, joel@freebsd.org >> Data: Gioved=EC 12 gennaio 2012, 07:43 >> On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 >> 4:17:14 pm Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: >>> Author: pfg >>> Date: Wed Jan 11 21:17:14 2012 >>> New Revision: 229981 >>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/229981 >>>=20 > ... =20 >>> The emu10kx driver is now free from the GPL. >>> =20 >>> PR: 153901 >>> Tested by: mav, joel >>> Approved by: jhb (mentor) >>> MFC after: 2 weeks >>=20 >> Is the emu10kx driver a superset of em10k1 now (meaning >> does it support all >> the em10k1 devices and should em10k1 be retired)? >>=20 >=20 > Both device drivers seem to have diverged significantly > and while emu10kx seems to be superior, some people still > have problems with it: >=20 > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201201100024.q0A0OF24069073 >=20 > so I suggest we keep both at least for a while. >=20 >> Also, it seems we should definitely add 'snd_emu10kx' to >> GENERIC on x86 and possible 'snd_emu10k1'. >>=20 SB Audigy chipsets are also treated differently for both cases. = My Audigy 4 card for instance is detected with both drivers, but only = the 10kx driver works with the card; similarly IIRC there are some = things that work with the 10k1 driver that don't work the same with the = 10kx. So while this would be nice to have, I'm not sure if it's an = effective use of FreeBSD's time to invest in as these chipsets are = effectively obsolete. Thanks! -Garrett=