From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 23 01:03:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F18A16A4CE for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 01:03:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hunger.joshualokken.com (joshualokken.com [63.226.239.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE76543D3F for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 01:02:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joshua@twobirds.us) Received: from freebsd.jolok.org ([10.0.0.3] helo=jolok.org) by hunger.joshualokken.com with smtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BGucX-0000JB-KP for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:57:09 -0700 Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 01:03:16 -0700 From: Joshua Lokken To: Lucas Holt Message-ID: <20040423080316.GC58118@freebsd.jolok.org> Mail-Followup-To: Lucas Holt , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200404221644.i3MGiYUk081922@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200404221644.i3MGiYUk081922@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Organization: Little to none... cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: newbie question: Gnome 2.6 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:03:02 -0000 * Lucas Holt [2004-04-22 11:32]: > > > The problem only seems to be with X11. I tried running several commands in > console mode that I can normally run from any location and they all worked > fine. so far startx seems to be the only thing that won't run like it used This could be for naught, but what does 'xinit' do for you? > to. I read something about shells having to be rehashed to update the PATH > lines? I run in bash if that makes a difference. > > ____ > > If I'm not mistaken, you only need to run rehash with a csh not sh/bash. > Besides, you said the machine rebooted. The path should be correct then. Right and right. Rehash is a [t]csh builtin, not present in Bourne shells, and yep, if the machine was rebooted (or the user logged out), then the point is moot. -- Joshua "You can't treat the working man this way! One day we'll form a union, and get the fair and equitable treatment we deserve! Then, we'll get corrupt and shiftless, and the Japanese will eat us alive!" --Anonymous Simpsons character