From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 16 23:27:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE32516A4CE for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:27:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2997143D2D for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:27:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linicks@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id b11so318488rne for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:27:01 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=YUC+atxST3nn6LF/b4Xadk88iXwRv5V7HcgNdMdjYeZL9Gd8mzvoILHJOQQMQfN7GHxm5VMAHR/3CndR/rf7aWEGNO7bIpo64erIqiA8beaaMZKF5PVHudSYyRTTDIiW4JJlG6GmmZtNjTOt84rkGjA2/mpGStUfI/FGDVuCer0= Received: by 10.38.102.12 with SMTP id z12mr988962rnb; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:27:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.165.35 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:27:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:27:01 -0700 From: Nick Pavlica To: Boris Spirialitious In-Reply-To: <20050316225143.91022.qmail@web90205.mail.scd.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050316225143.91022.qmail@web90205.mail.scd.yahoo.com> cc: cyb <"cyb."@gmx.net> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.x Opteron Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nick Pavlica List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:27:03 -0000 Boris, I would agree that my initial impression of 5.3 was that it was slow compared to 4.x. After some tuning, I now have 5.3 running at an acceptable performance level. You may want to start testing the newer versions of 5 current. I have noticed improved performance on my test servers and believe that 5.4 will demonstrate an improvement in performance. I know that the guys on the performance list would like to get some good feedback if you find any specific bottlenecks with it as well. --Nick On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:51:43 -0800 (PST), Boris Spirialitious wrote: > > --- cyb wrote: > > http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64.html > > > > Looks like you will need to use 5.3-release (or > > 5.3-stable/5.4-prerelease if you have more than > > 4GB). > > > > Why can you not use 5.3? > > 5.3 is too slow, and we have custom code. Why use > faster hardware just to use slower version of O/S? > Please don't start with flames. This is what I > feel. > > I don't need so much RAM, so 4.x will work with > 1 or 2GB of RAM? > > Boris > > > > > > > On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 09:43 -0800, Boris > > Spirialitious wrote: > > > --- Boris Spirialitious > > > wrote: > > > > When opteron support start for Freebsd? I have > > 4.9. > > > > is supported? Or 4.11 better? I can't use 5.x. > > > > > > > > Will a i386 disk boot on opteron system? Can I > > > > use same disk image for intel and amd MBs? Any > > > > big problems? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Boris > > > > > > Does anyone know answer please? Someone must use > > > Opteron here > > > > > > Boris > > > > -- > > GnuPG key : 0xD25FCC81 | > > http://cyb.websimplex.de/pubkey.asc > > Fingerprint: D182 6F22 7EEC DD4C 0F6E 564C 691B > > 0372 D25F CC81 > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! > http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >