From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 10 09:12:29 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 47C3116A4CE; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:12:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eth0.b.smtp.sonic.net (eth0.b.smtp.sonic.net [64.142.19.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CFD5E43D1F; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:12:27 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bmah@intruder.kitchenlab.org)
Received: from intruder.kitchenlab.org (adsl-64-142-31-106.sonic.net
	[64.142.31.106])hBAHCPHT030732
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
	Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:12:26 -0800
Received: from intruder.kitchenlab.org (bmah@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	hBAHCPO0083022;	Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:12:25 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bmah@intruder.kitchenlab.org)
Message-Id: <200312101712.hBAHCPO0083022@intruder.kitchenlab.org>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4
To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
In-Reply-To: <xzpiskolilu.fsf@dwp.des.no> 
References: <200312100457.hBA4vkO0075658@intruder.kitchenlab.org>
	<xzpy8tklkbx.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<200312101629.hBAGTOO0082138@intruder.kitchenlab.org>
	<xzpiskolilu.fsf@dwp.des.no>
Comments: In-reply-to des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
   message dated "Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:53:33 +0100."
From: bmah@freebsd.org (Bruce A. Mah)
X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5<Pi&akO)o^8;
	[r
	%l(8ZHlbF`dD>v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A
	2V%N&+
X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif
X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-1548613775P";
	 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:12:25 -0800
Sender: bmah@intruder.kitchenlab.org
cc: bmah@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: doc/ slush 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bmah@freebsd.org
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:12:29 -0000

--==_Exmh_-1548613775P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

If memory serves me right, Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= wrote:
> bmah@freebsd.org (Bruce A. Mah) writes:
> > This affects non-committers as well, in that some people who work on
> > translations aren't committers.
> 
> The chances of a heads up getting lost in the noise is much higher on
> -doc than on doc-developers.  You should at the very least Bcc:
> doc-developers on announcements like this.

Fine.

> > I generally expect that people who do a serious amount of work in doc/ 
> > are also reading the doc@ list.
> 
> Sure, and src committers read -current, but the code freeze is still
> announced on developers (though it should really go to src-developers)

This isn't an apt analogy but I'm juggling too many things to get into 
a debate about this.

Thanks,

Bruce.



--==_Exmh_-1548613775P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5+ 20020506

iD8DBQE/11P52MoxcVugUsMRAvljAJ9ocGi2/EL13tLCO7TxDoFQuvRetwCeOW4S
mE5TDq6jkTSdgy1qKL9ko1I=
=ge6x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_-1548613775P--