From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 27 08:51:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8699016A4BF for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 08:51:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.mho.com (smtp.mho.net [64.58.4.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36DCC43FE5 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 08:51:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 29108 invoked by uid 1002); 27 Aug 2003 15:51:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) (64.58.1.252) by smtp.mho.net with SMTP; 27 Aug 2003 15:51:19 -0000 Message-ID: <3F4CD36C.40604@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:51:08 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030425 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran References: <3F4C143D.7000909@potentialtech.com> <20030827114316.300fd455.Alexander@Leidinger.net> <3F4CB7D2.9000503@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <3F4CB7D2.9000503@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org cc: Alexander Leidinger cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance tests I did with FreeBSD, Linux and PostgreSQL X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:51:22 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: > Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> I don't know if 5.1-RELEASE has malloc debugging enabled, but to be on >> the safe side you should maybe do a "ln -s aj /etc/malloc.conf" before >> you start PostgreSQL. malloc debugging is disabled in 5.0-R and 5.1-R. Once we hit 5-STABLE it will be turned off for good in the branch. > > I may look into that, but it seems like the more important thing to do > is test 4.8 at this point. > > If you look at the times, these tests are time-consuming. I probably > should have reduced the number of records involved, but if I do that > now, I have to rerun all the tests ... > It would be interesting to see if the recent locking of the ATA driver has any benefit on these tests. Of course if you update to 5-CURRENT then you'll need to disable INVARIANTS, WITNESS, and malloc debugging. Scott