From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 24 16:40:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: toolchain@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C78490; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 16:40:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alfred@freebsd.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31836279A; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 16:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Alfreds-MacBook-Pro-9.local (c-67-180-208-218.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.180.208.218]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFA921A3DA7; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 09:40:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5218E1E1.1040809@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 09:40:01 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc References: <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com> <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0@FreeBSD.org> <5CE4B5FA-9DA0-45E4-8D67-161E0829FE6B@FreeBSD.org> <5217DBAB.5030607@freebsd.org> <86032E72-A569-4946-B4F8-26F687067B31@bsdimp.com> <1380949A-254A-4222-BEDE-0C23E16E4F67@freebsd.org> <8C31A000-6806-4291-98A4-E8291E637BD2@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "re@FreeBSD.org Engineering Team" , "current@freebsd.org" , John-Mark Gurney , toolchain@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 16:40:02 -0000 On 8/24/13 9:33 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > You know, I could be a total jerk and say: > > "If you push gcc out to a port, and you have the 'external compiler' > toolchain support working correctly enough to build with this, why don't we > just push clang out to a port, and be done with it?" > > ... just saying. > > > > -adrian > Are you calling me a total jerk? :) I'm fine with that because I agree. -Alfred