From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 17 08:00:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from green.homeunix.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB9916A4CF; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 08:00:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (green@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.homeunix.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i3HF0JLx039296; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 11:00:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from green@green.homeunix.org) Message-Id: <200404171500.i3HF0JLx039296@green.homeunix.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Luigi Rizzo In-Reply-To: Message from Luigi Rizzo of "Sat, 17 Apr 2004 06:00:59 PDT." <20040417060059.A50118@xorpc.icir.org> From: "Brian F. Feldman" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 11:00:18 -0400 Sender: green@green.homeunix.org cc: Andre Oppermann cc: Julian Elischer cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: ported NetBSD if_bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 15:00:22 -0000 Luigi Rizzo wrote: > I don't understand why every time we have this kind of discussion > again and again about providing multiple solutions to one problem. > People can have different opinions about diversity being good or bad > (which is good -- diversity is good :), but I would be much happier > to hear specific arguments not generic ones. In this particular > case the answer seems pretty obvious. That it does, my friend: ports/net/if_bridge -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\