From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 8 10:07:52 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA05852 for current-outgoing; Thu, 8 Feb 1996 10:07:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA05838 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 1996 10:07:49 -0800 (PST) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA08296; Thu, 8 Feb 1996 10:59:38 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199602081759.KAA08296@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: FS PATCHES: THE NEXT GENERATION To: lutz@muc.de (Lutz Albers) Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 10:59:38 -0700 (MST) Cc: terry@lambert.org, freebsd-current@freefall.FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: from "Lutz Albers" at Feb 8, 96 11:43:30 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > -I know. That was the source of my consternation. I specified a > -comamnd line of "cvs diff -c" and that is what came out. > > Hello, > > is there are reason not to use 'cvs rdiff' ? This should create patch > output, at least according to the cvs man page. cvs [rdiff aborted]: must specify at least one revision/date! Apparently, patch can take "cvs diff" output as input. Go figure. 8-). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.