From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 2 05:27:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5759B16A4CE for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 05:27:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF5F43D4C for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 05:27:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.218] (c-24-1-210-118.client.comcast.net[24.1.210.118]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2005030205272601100stt49e>; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 05:27:26 +0000 Message-ID: <42254EE3.9020905@computer.org> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 23:28:03 -0600 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050127) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland Smith References: <42234249.8060402@computer.org> <20050228173818.GA915@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20050228173818.GA915@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox and Macromedia Flash Plugin... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 05:27:27 -0000 Roland Smith wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 10:09:45AM -0600, Eric Schuele wrote: > >>I have searched the archives and googled a good bit. Everyone seems to >>rely on the Linux plugin wrapper. Is there a 'no Linux compatibility" >>alternative that works well with Firefox? > > > There is a port called flashplugin-firefox, using libflash. I tried it > but is was prone to crashing on amd64, on 5.3-RELEASE-p4. I agree... after using it this evening (flashplugin-firefox with no other supporting ports) it has proven very unstable. A few sites worked... but that was definitely the exception. Many failed either proving unresponsive or by pulling firefox down completely. Z.Z. suggested a few additional linux ports. I may give them a try as well. > > Roland -- Regards, Eric