From owner-freebsd-questions  Sat Jan  8  1:20:39 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from reactor.neospeed.com (reactor.neospeed.com [216.184.181.34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F19152C5
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat,  8 Jan 2000 01:20:37 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mbrad@neospeed.com)
Received: from neospeed.com (ws1.neospeed.com [216.184.181.60])
	by reactor.neospeed.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA60654
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 8 Jan 2000 01:21:55 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <3877005F.E5B5823@neospeed.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2000 01:16:16 -0800
From: Mark Brad <mbrad@neospeed.com>
Organization: NeoSpeed Networks
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Lynksys EtherPCI NIC.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hello,

    Recently, a NIC on one of my servers failed, and I didn't have a
backup on hand (3Com 3C905), and while running to Fry's as a last
resort, I picked up
a LynkSys EtherPCI NIC. Shouldn't this NIC use the "de" driver? It was
working just fine using the "ed" driver, and the dmesg output is strange
and follows:

ed1: <NE2000 PCI Ethernet (ProLAN)> rev 0x00 int a irq 15 on pci0.10.0
ed1: address 00:20:78:16:6d:26, type NE2000 (16 bit)

    Just wondering if this will be changed, or if the current settings
are correct (for future reference). Thanks.

Regards,
Mark Brad.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message