From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 2 19:35:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB6F16A420 for ; Sun, 2 Apr 2006 19:35:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8F843D77 for ; Sun, 2 Apr 2006 19:35:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so668059wxc for ; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 12:35:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=grU2vzrgfCc27knBoa0Cr4qu8ewC4eNG1ZRD+2zP5CinTX+9hBS7KlRu4eY2rYaopdFyHTRH1fRJUoh6VFpp8bjHvr8oe7Z2gEa7kATS9gVpsNtYMRZfI3i7FzfCKjH49zQRPpA4akmM9avrhbnWrlPOmHYzJRagjOZcQt8/q1w= Received: by 10.70.47.4 with SMTP id u4mr1085882wxu; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 12:35:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.57.15 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Apr 2006 12:35:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 14:35:20 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "james g." In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <0B538C86-FFCD-4AE4-A3A4-D5A2990AFEAA@veldt.com> Cc: Andrew Pantyukhin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jdk15 on 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 19:35:26 -0000 On 4/2/06, james g. wrote: > Granted I understand that expecting so much from this little machine > is really pushing it, it will eventually just be running a small java- > based server, that unfortunately requires jdk15. I wouldn't ever > choose it on purpose. > > With a total swap size of roughly 2.5GB still generating failures, is > this a lost cause, or should I be looking for additional solutions? /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk15/ perhaps? -- --