From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 26 02:50:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF33E106566B for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:50:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD68A8FC12 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n9Q2o3AX077704 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:50:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n9Q2o3rQ077703; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:50:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:50:03 GMT Message-Id: <200910260250.n9Q2o3rQ077703@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "Edward Sanford Sutton, III" Cc: Subject: Re: ports/127810: print/hplip 2.8.2 can't talk to my usnb printer (HP PS8250) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Edward Sanford Sutton, III" List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:50:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/127810; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Edward Sanford Sutton, III" To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, pav@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/127810: print/hplip 2.8.2 can't talk to my usnb printer (HP PS8250) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:48:45 -0700 The patch was committed partially; the line with the if test was dropped. With the patch, scanning works fine (on my hp photosmart c6180) but with the comitted form without the if test it'll cause the errors. I do not know how it works as I tried printing the variable and found it repeats the loop when it looks to me like it shouldn't, but in the end it gets the scanner working. The print/hplip port has a different if test modification; maybe it addresses the issue in a more focused manner but I don't know driver programming to have any clue.