From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug 24 15:25:59 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB716605
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 15:25:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9297D3794
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 15:25:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7OFPxl5087312
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 15:25:59 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 192617] [NEW PORT] x11/nvidia-driver-optimus
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 15:25:59 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: davidjx8p@gmail.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-192617-13-XTLCzlIzdv@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-192617-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-192617-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 15:25:59 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192617

--- Comment #4 from David Mackay <davidjx8p@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Alexey Dokuchaev from comment #3)
> I'd rather not create another slave port, but add an OPTION to the master
> port instead.  Would it be fine with you?
> 
> Slaves (we already have a few of nvidia-driver) add certain non-zero
> maintenance burden, and in the long run many of them we have right now in
> the Ports Tree will likely go away once the framework learns sub-packages.
> 
> I'll post a patch for reviews shortly.

An option would work fine, but it might be pertinent to keep a very simple
slave port that simply sets the default options to include an 'Optimus' option
as well. This allows its installation via `pkg install'.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.