From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 30 09:55:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6103F106566C for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:55:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mihamina@rktmb.org) Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (slow3-v.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E028FC13 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:55:57 +0000 (UTC) X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D2170971; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:30:10 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 41.190.237.66 Received: from [192.168.0.111] (unknown [41.190.237.66]) (Authenticated sender: out@rktmb.org) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 653DA1720B9; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:30:09 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E5CAD9E.6050903@rktmb.org> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:30:06 +0300 From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110801 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd Current References: <4E5941D6.9090106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E5BEF65.2010502@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E5BEF65.2010502@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Volodymyr Kostyrko Subject: Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:55:57 -0000 On 08/29/2011 10:58 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > If that page would be updated at least monthly giving fair comparison > with other os'es it could serve a big pros list for preferring FreeBSD > over other systems. I dont think a monthly update is the good solution. A per release update is better, as far as releases bring a new set that could be compared. Then, a deep knwoledge of the other OSes is required in order to keep credit. I think it's a huge amount of work, that should be assigned to the project itself. IMHO, Let's delegate this task to Wikipedia or StackOverflow... -- RMA.