From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 8 04:51:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9596637B401 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 04:51:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cicero0.cybercity.dk (cicero0.cybercity.dk [212.242.40.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA62D43F75 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 04:51:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from db@traceroute.dk) Received: from user1.cybercity.dk (fxp0.user1.ip.cybercity.dk [212.242.41.34]) by cicero0.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3457128DC3; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 13:51:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from main (port132.ds1-arsy.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.239.73]) by user1.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 878F968B01; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 13:51:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 14:00:12 +0200 From: Socketd To: Terry Lambert , hackers@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20030708140012.0fd685c8.db@traceroute.dk> In-Reply-To: <3F0AA830.9A82CB37@mindspring.com> References: <20030707012205.3103dfc8.db@traceroute.dk> <20030707153314.GA1695@webboy.soth.at> <20030707180252.44036c61.db@traceroute.dk> <3F0A9A1C.25E6EB35@mindspring.com> <20030708131339.16da151f.db@traceroute.dk> <3F0AA830.9A82CB37@mindspring.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 5 "Advanced" networking questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 11:51:54 -0000 On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 04:17:04 -0700 Terry Lambert wrote: > > I don't want to disable ICMP, just don't want to respond when ttl=0, > > meaning when my firewall/gateway is on a "traceroute path". > > You should specifically modify the ICMP code to not respond > to echo datagrams, or when ttl == 0, then, and work it that > way. In other words, it's time to hack your network stack > to specifically add that "feature". Hmm, why not just use a firewall? br socketd