From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 8 13:01:58 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA26863 for current-outgoing; Thu, 8 Feb 1996 13:01:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA26858 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 1996 13:01:55 -0800 (PST) Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id NAA01686; Thu, 8 Feb 1996 13:01:23 -0800 From: Julian Elischer Message-Id: <199602082101.NAA01686@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: CCITT support in current To: wollman@lcs.mit.edu (Garrett A. Wollman) Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 13:01:23 -0800 (PST) Cc: sandy@lapkin.rosprint.ru, freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <9602081605.AA28022@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> from "Garrett A. Wollman" at Feb 8, 96 11:05:11 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > < said: > > > I've found, what last current does not support CCITT already. Can > > I ask why ? I have installed X400 GW on FreeBSD and plan to install > > other tech. sites on FreeBSD, but I must use other system due of > > abcense of CCITT protocols. > > If you wish to support that code, we'd be happy to let you have it. > We don't have any active contributors who actually use X.25 &c, so we > are not prepared to support it. If you're willing to provide official > support for it---and that means fixing it to kill all the remaining > compile warnings and updating it to keep up with changes in the > networking framework---then we might consider shipping the code again. The files are still in the CVS tree so they can be re-inserted into the tree. certainly I think this was a REALLY BAD UNANIMOUS DSECISION! This ranks right up there with the things that caused the NetBSD split. I was never asked about it and I would certainly have argued against it.. > > -GAWollman > > -- > Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... > wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. > Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people > MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant >