From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 11:03:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707A216A400; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 11:03:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3554D13C481; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 11:03:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from coolf89ea26645 (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l23B3dMb084287; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 03:03:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Message-ID: <002d01c75d83$7b349110$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Cheffo" References: <45E7F09B.7070005@zedat.fu-berlin.de><00c401c75caf$89ee3370$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <45E80CC5.8080607@FreeBSD-BG.org> Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 03:02:43 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Sat, 03 Mar 2007 03:03:45 -0800 (PST) Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (S)ATA performance in FBSD 6.2/7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 11:03:49 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cheffo" To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" Cc: ; "O. Hartmann" ; Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 3:38 AM Subject: Re: (S)ATA performance in FBSD 6.2/7.0 > Hi, > > > I think the problem is that the benchmark runs with small files and most > files are in cache that's why it shows higher speeds I think the problem is O Hartmann (the OP) has proven by his lack of followup that he was just trolling. Kind of what I guessed yesterday. Ted