From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 15:31:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65160106567C for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:31:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steven@hudson-trading.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f18.google.com (mail-qy0-f18.google.com [209.85.221.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE0F8FC21 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:31:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steven@hudson-trading.com) Received: by qyk11 with SMTP id 11so4361277qyk.19 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:31:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.214.244.18 with SMTP id r18mr930813qah.285.1229527879307; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:31:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.2.200.65? ([209.249.190.254]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm3459964ywp.40.2008.12.17.07.31.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:31:18 -0800 (PST) Sender: Steven Kreuzer Message-Id: From: Steven Kreuzer To: Philip M. Gollucci In-Reply-To: <4946B0C0.90106@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:31:16 -0500 References: <20081215191535.GC33004@atarininja.org> <4946B0C0.90106@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) Cc: Wesley Shields , Chris Meyer , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RT 3.8? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:31:20 -0000 On Dec 15, 2008, at 2:32 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Wesley Shields wrote: >> I've also added him as CC to this reply so he can speak up if he >> has any >> more information to add. > I've gotten several comments (esp recently). My first thought is to > commit it as is and let the PRs come it. Several people have been > using the prototype in production for a while now. I have been running this port in both production with roughly 15 people using it. (This number of users should grown to around 40 in the near future). The production version has been extremely reliable and I would say that it ready to be added into the ports tree. I am willing to assist with any PRs that open up regarding this port. If you would like, put me down as the maintainer until your workload dies down and then you can take maintainership back from me. -- Steven Kreuzer http://www.exit2shell.com/~skreuzer