From owner-freebsd-bugs Sat Dec 27 14:26:47 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA23816 for bugs-outgoing; Sat, 27 Dec 1997 14:26:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs) Received: from free.asel.net.tr (free.asel.net.tr [195.174.20.102]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA23663 for ; Sat, 27 Dec 1997 14:24:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vlad@free.asel.net.tr) Received: from localhost (vlad@localhost) by free.asel.net.tr (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id CAA05483 for ; Sun, 28 Dec 1997 02:24:12 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from vlad@free.asel.net.tr) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 1997 02:24:12 +0200 (EET) From: Vlad Cambur To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf/5381 In-Reply-To: <199712271959.LAA14670@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 27 Dec 1997, Steve Price wrote: > Synopsis: how use RealTeck 8029: Plug and pray NE2000. > > State-Changed-From-To: open-closed > State-Changed-By: steve > State-Changed-When: Sat Dec 27 11:57:27 PST 1997 > State-Changed-Why: > As Daniel O'Callaghan pointed out, the originator should > upgrade to at least 2.2-STABLE and then if the board still > does not respond properly, submit another PR with _all_ > the relevant details. > Have SureCom ep-325 cards with the same chip (RealTek 8029) and 2.2.2-RELEASE worked ok with it, the same with 2.2-SNAP-112697 and 2.2.5-STBLE.