From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Aug 13 10:49:10 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from ns.internet.dk (ns.internet.dk [194.19.140.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF8C37B55D
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 13 Aug 2000 10:48:55 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from leif@neland.dk)
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by ns.internet.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id TAA80306;
	Sun, 13 Aug 2000 19:48:50 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from leif@neland.dk)
Received: from gina (gina.neland.dk [192.168.0.14])
	by arnold.neland.dk (8.11.0/8.9.3) with SMTP id e7DHD0574126;
	Sun, 13 Aug 2000 19:13:00 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from leif@neland.dk)
Message-ID: <000b01c00549$bcb05c80$0e00a8c0@neland.dk>
From: "Leif Neland" <leif@neland.dk>
To: <chris@calldei.com>
Cc: <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
References: <004401c00543$50c661a0$0e00a8c0@neland.dk> <20000813113112.A41275@holly.calldei.com>
Subject: Re: 2 inetd's with 2 nics
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 19:12:53 +0200
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Costello" <chris@calldei.com>
To: "Leif Neland" <leif@neland.dk>
Cc: <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2000 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: 2 inetd's with 2 nics


> On Sunday, August 13, 2000, Leif Neland wrote:
> > Is it possible and a good idea to have one inetd for the inside nic and
> > another with fewer services for the outside on a gateway machine,
> > or should I just use ipfw/ipchain for this?
>
>    From the inetd man page:
>
>      -a      Specify a specific IP address to bind to.  Alternatively, a
host-
>              name can be specified, in which case the IPv4 or IPv6 address
>              which corresponds to that hostname is used.  Usually a
hostname
>              is specified when inetd is run inside a jail(8),  in which
case
>              the hostname corresponds to the jail(8) environment.
>
Yes, I know this. But is it a good idea to have separate inetd's for inside
and outside?

Leif





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message