Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 18:34:33 -0400 From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 802.11 AP Status? Message-ID: <20031009223433.GA66764@ussenterprise.ufp.org> In-Reply-To: <20031009165331.Q61977@odysseus.silby.com> References: <20031009192707.GA57227@ussenterprise.ufp.org> <20031009165331.Q61977@odysseus.silby.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message written on Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 04:59:46PM -0500, Mike Silbers=
ack wrote:
> Note that if you're willing to run -current, your options are even
> better: According to the ath manpage, the Atheros based cards support BSS
> mode, they're a/b/g capable, and they're true PCI/cardbus cards, so they
> should perform better.
Hey, this is looking like a really good option. The only thing
that's not clear to me is can you do b and g at the same time (eg,
have a 54M g and 11M b client off the same AP) with a single card,
or would you need to have two cards, one running in each mode?
I get the impression if you run an AP in 802.11g mode then 802.11b
clients "just work", but it doesn't say that explicitly.
--=20
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/heJ5Nh6mMG5yMTYRAoWzAJ9q9aJH63LFdGuIM5LbB9pV8ny55QCfW4B+
bDe9mANmdRhm0gZIVyoyFAo=
=s09e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031009223433.GA66764>