From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 19 14:35:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE4A16A4CE for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:35:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ms-smtp-01.tampabay.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-smtplb.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.5.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC0B43D1F for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:35:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from aj305523@tampabay.rr.com) Received: from moe.howard (6532128hfc43.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.128.43]) i2JMZ7DJ012322 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:35:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from moe.howard (localhost.howard [127.0.0.1]) by moe.howard (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2JMZ7s4064900 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:35:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from aj305523@tampabay.rr.com) Received: (from walter@localhost) by moe.howard (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2JMZ7S9064899 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:35:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from aj305523@tampabay.rr.com) X-Authentication-Warning: moe.howard: walter set sender to aj305523@tampabay.rr.com using -f Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:35:06 -0500 From: Al Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040319223506.GA63254@bhunter.net> References: <20040319172130.GB2044@cs025_2k> <20040319174618.GH64130@keyslapper.org> <200403191428.24150.cmcmanis@mcmanis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403191428.24150.cmcmanis@mcmanis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Re: Top posting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 22:35:10 -0000 I'm with you... Top-posting makes the most sense for me. I was born to top-post. On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 02:28:24PM -0800, Charles McManis wrote: > Perhaps it isn't "logical", if you've read all the email then the quoted > thread is just reference anyway. This is the "new stuff". I love being able > to read mail in the preview-pane vs "next message" , jump to the bottom, > "next message" jump to the bottom. > > It comes down to opinion I think > --Chuck