From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 8 17:50:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295C616A420; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 17:50:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA1143D60; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 17:50:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1D5200086; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 18:50:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 050E2200098; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 18:50:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76AF744487E; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 17:47:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 17:47:42 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Andre Oppermann In-Reply-To: <440F1167.B6704371@freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20060308174449.N73618@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <1141836337.17213.21.camel@mayday.esat.net> <20060308170018.GF68655@catpipe.net> <440F1167.B6704371@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port of OpenOSPFD X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 17:50:17 -0000 On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Andre Oppermann wrote: > Phil Regnauld wrote: >> and it will be quite a collection with quagga, zebra and open[bgp|ospf]d. > > Zebra is dead. Quagga is a fork of it which is actively being worked on. > The original author of Zebra went to start his own company commercially > selling and developing the codebase he already had. There hasn't been > any meaningful activity on open-source Zebra for years. depends on your definition of "meaningful". There are changes and I know a lot of people prefering zebra over quagga because of the more stable code base and less 'people' playing with code which not really improved stability... -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT