From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 6 15:04:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D575F16A41F for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 15:04:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laszlof@tvog.net) Received: from ritamari.vonostingroup.com (ritamari.vonostingroup.com [216.144.193.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86AA643D46 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 15:04:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laszlof@tvog.net) Received: from adsl-68-72-248-38.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net ([68.72.248.38] helo=tvog.net) by ritamari.vonostingroup.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.53 (FreeBSD)) id 1ENXIr-0003YI-U8 for freebsd-www@freebsd.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 11:05:02 -0400 Message-ID: <43453D19.1030809@tvog.net> Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 11:04:57 -0400 From: Frank Laszlo User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ritamari.vonostingroup.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tvog.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Bug in docs.html X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 15:04:59 -0000 I noticed that the man.cgi on docs.html is linking to "./cgi/man.cgi" Is this the intended location? the previous site linked all cgi scripts to "http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/*" so that mirror sites would not have to utilize their resources for serving up the dynamic content. Also, a quick note on send-pr.html. Why is there an image verification field on there now? Wouldnt an automated script still be able to use send-pr(1)? so whats the point of this? Hope this helps. -- __________________________________________________ Frank Laszlo System Administrator The VonOstin Group Email: laszlof@tvog.net WWW: http://www.vonostingroup.com Mobile: 248-863-7584