From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 26 01:41:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54D8A93; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 01:41:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817AD2F47; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 01:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from trevally.dhcp.nue.suse.com (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.2]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 753373F418; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 21:41:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 03:41:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Volodymyr Kostyrko Subject: Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc In-Reply-To: <521751AF.6040905@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com> <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0@FreeBSD.org> <521751AF.6040905@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 02:40:36 +0000 Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org, John-Mark Gurney , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bernhard_Fr=F6hlich?= , current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 01:41:35 -0000 On Fri, 23 Aug 2013, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > I object. Many ports that compiles perfectly on gcc 4.2.1 can't be > compiled with lang/gcc. I checked this once and the number of ports > that require strictly gcc 4.2.1 was bigger for me then number of > ports that can't be compiled with clang but fill fine on lang/gcc. > > I'll gonna recheck whether lang/gcc42 is sufficient for them. But I > have that bad feeling... If there are ports that use USE_GCC=any and do not build with lang/gcc, these should have USE_GCC=4.2 -- without a '+'! -- not USE_GCC=any. It'll be great if you can fix any such port. Gerald