From owner-freebsd-hardware Tue Apr 22 11:21:42 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA00558 for hardware-outgoing; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 11:21:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.cdsnet.net (mail.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA00538; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 11:21:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.cdsnet.net (mail.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.5]) by mail.cdsnet.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA29805; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 11:21:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 11:21:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Jaye Mathisen To: Brett Glass cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" , jdc@denver.net, hardware@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Yet another Adaptec 2940UW problem :( In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19970422114918.006ad8d8@lariat.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Or contact somebody like PC Week, since they're using Linux and FreeBSD in more of their tests, and encourage them to maybe sneak a note in an editorial about lack of support for what is potentially a huge market base... On Tue, 22 Apr 1997, Brett Glass wrote: > At 11:35 AM 4/22/97 -0600, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > > >Another thing that contributes to problems > >with the "free" drivers is that Adaptec doesn't give out engineering > >contacts to "little guys". > > Maybe you should contact their marketing department and note that, > between Linux, FreeBSD, and NetBSD, your work goes to a HUGE share > of their market and an overwhelming s hare of the Internet world (since > so many Web, news, and mail servers run these OSes). With luck, they'll > recognize the importance of this code and put you in touch with the > engineers. > > --Brett Glass >