From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Jul 28 18:35:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (news-ma.rhein-neckar.de [193.197.90.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E4D15308 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 1999 18:35:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bigeye.rhein-neckar.de!naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de) Received: from mips.rhein-neckar.de (uucp@localhost) by news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with bsmtp id DAA12852 for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 03:31:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bigeye.rhein-neckar.de!naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de) Received: by mips.rhein-neckar.de id m119efH-000WyXC (Debian Smail-3.2.0.101 1997-Dec-17 #2); Thu, 29 Jul 1999 03:07:19 +0200 (CEST) From: naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de (Christian Weisgerber) Subject: Re: What to tell to Linux-centric people?! Date: 29 Jul 1999 03:07:50 +0200 Message-ID: <7no9h6$1jol$1@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de> References: <7nmj4t$2uip$1@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de> <199907282331.QAA19206@usr06.primenet.com> To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Terry Lambert wrote: > > gmake is not required to build bash. > > Really? The FreeBSD port doesn't depend on gmake. In order to be sure, I just build it with no gmake available. No problem. A lot of the GNU world is designed to be very portable, that's part of their claim to fame. > How do you handle the expansion of an expansion that > the current version of configure spits out when processing > Makefile.in? Please be more specific. Where exactly do you perceive a problem? -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message