From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 18 07:44:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51EB116A4CF; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 07:44:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.portaone.com (support.portaone.com [195.70.151.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9862943D2D; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 07:44:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sobomax@portaone.com) Received: from [192.168.0.254] ([192.168.2.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by www.portaone.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j2I7iar1044461 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 18 Mar 2005 08:44:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sobomax@portaone.com) Message-ID: <423A86D9.5030504@portaone.com> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 09:44:25 +0200 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Porta Software Ltd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Schultz References: <20050318055212.GA70385@FreeBSD.org> <20050318061647.GA40922@VARK.MIT.EDU> <423A7277.1000202@samsco.org> <20050317.233645.74714466.imp@bsdimp.com> <20050318064521.GA42508@VARK.MIT.EDU> In-Reply-To: <20050318064521.GA42508@VARK.MIT.EDU> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/685/Wed Jan 26 10:08:24 2005 clamav-milter version 0.80j on www.portaone.com X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: scottl@samsco.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG cc: danfe@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Warner Losh Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/msun/i387 fenv.c fenv.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 07:44:48 -0000 David Schultz wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005, Warner Losh wrote: > >>>You had better bump the version number for libm before 6.0 rolls >>>around!! I've just found a 3rd party binary-only package that >>>supports 'FreeBSD 5.x' but is linked against libm.so.2. Ugh. We >>>need to bury that mistake and NOT make it again. >> >>6.0 already has /lib/libm.so.3 > > > So does 5.3. I think Scott's point is that if we're going to bump > it for 6.X at all, we had better do it soon or risk running into > the same mess we had before. I agree with that, although at > present I don't know of a compelling reason to do the bump the > libm version number at all. Haven't several functions been removed from -CURRENT version of libm recently? IMHO this provides sufficient reason for version bump. Actually I think it makes sense to bump all libraries automatically when -CURRENT goes one major number up. There is just no much sense in preserving partial compatibility. -Maxim