From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 20:21:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4E4106566C; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 20:21:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmh.aybabtu@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5AB58FC13; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 20:21:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnk5 with SMTP id k5so2958447ggn.13 for ; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:21:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=PYe1+z2U+dz6P1wm/+3XevLfwBmoeI/1yBG1FMtgRnY=; b=UbH6Xpt87OOHSmKrcehr58dYlASh43vxBWER/Z5djSE0x8TF6J1Ox9qi3DnPOERwjN wACkZ5L4xJyD/t6cY/DVsSrNInp9802xGMEpxhIXZsshkZGrmHRw9A1Ebls/lYtXJL5V HqD78sfqgu0Ss+uC9oXmhCLI7ViVH2j70nfLA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.236.34 with SMTP id ur2mr9369593igc.20.1328300493205; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:21:33 -0800 (PST) Sender: rmh.aybabtu@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.152.10 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 12:21:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20120130182459.GA1096@thorin> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 20:21:33 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: DOKvlNjnLY3rpBIXq252Af60GJI Message-ID: From: Robert Millan To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Adrian Chadd , mlaier@freebsd.org, Kostik Belousov , freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] GNU/kFreeBSD detection in PF X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:21:34 -0000 El 30 de gener de 2012 18:47, Bjoern A. Zeeb ha escrit: > As posted previously to freebsd-pf we shall unifdef pf as soon as someone > get some other work in, so the entire #ifdef __FreeBSD__ checks would be > gone. > > I think that's a lot better solution than further mangling things. Ok, I'll just wait for that then. Sorry for the noise.