From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 03:43:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE3816A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:43:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail5.dslextreme.com (mail5.dslextreme.com [66.51.199.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D04843D1D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:43:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmlewis@dslextreme.com) Received: (qmail 30933 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 03:43:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www.dslextreme.com) (66.51.199.92) by 192.168.8.93 with SMTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:43:46 +0000 Message-ID: <1fdf4a4cc86a78ba4a69464a.20040626204346.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> In-Reply-To: <001001c45bdd$ff276b50$0200a8c0@satellite> References: <1776a3885a58dea4d7ea.20040626010713.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> <001001c45bdd$ff276b50$0200a8c0@satellite> Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 20:43:46 -0700 (PDT) From: "Joshua Lewis" To: "dave" User-Agent: DSL Extreme Webmail (www.dslextreme.com) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) cc: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building a Stable Secure FreeBSD Mail server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jmlewis@dslextreme.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:43:47 -0000 The MTA is PostFix http://bsdhound.com/downloads/Creating_a_Stable_Secure_FreeBSD_Mailserver.pdf Document date is 10/17/2003 So it is not to old. So far it is pretty accurate. Thank you, Joshua Lewis dave > Hi, > What mail server was this doc dealing with and can you give me the > address? Some clues as to the age is what version of fbsd was being > discussed, currently 4.10 is production stable while 5.2.1 is new > technology, even though i use that on my production systems. > Not sure as to the difference between md5 and blf password hashing, i > do > know that they both are methods of encrypting a password and supposedly > blf > is more secure but it also doesn't have compatibility with anything else. > HTH. > Dave. > >