From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 17 14:40:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F0F106566B; Mon, 17 May 2010 14:40:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@mawer.org) Received: from mail-px0-f182.google.com (mail-px0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E2D8FC27; Mon, 17 May 2010 14:40:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi7 with SMTP id 7so1269349pxi.13 for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 07:40:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.101.16 with SMTP id d16mr3684267rvm.169.1274103450727; Mon, 17 May 2010 06:37:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.207.2 with HTTP; Mon, 17 May 2010 06:37:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BF13743.8030503@quis.cx> References: <201005171212.o4HCCsmW080776@freefall.freebsd.org> <4BF13743.8030503@quis.cx> Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 23:37:30 +1000 Message-ID: From: Antony Mawer To: Jille Timmermans Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: trasz@freebsd.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/120749: [request] Suggest upping the default kern.ps_arg_cache_limit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:40:52 -0000 There was some recent comments that suggested this was beneficial with various Tomcat/Java applications, which otherwise experienced their command lines being truncated in the rc.d script for tomcat. What is the trade of increasing this - increased memory usage? -- Antony On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Jille Timmermans wrote: > Can't we better start a discussion about this? > If we deassign it we will be quite sure it will remain there forever. > > I don't think it is really usefull as it is already adjustable by `sysctl > kern.ps_arg_cache_limit=1024` and nobody really seems to care. > > > -- Jille > Ps, I have not looked back in the archives whether this was already > discussed; as there was no followup and I'm lazy. > > Op 17-5-2010 14:12, trasz@freebsd.org schreef: >> >> Synopsis: [request] Suggest upping the default kern.ps_arg_cache_limit >> >> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-arch->freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org >> Responsible-Changed-By: trasz >> Responsible-Changed-When: Mon May 17 12:11:08 UTC 2010 >> Responsible-Changed-Why: >> Deassign; mail to arch@ every month is annoying. >> >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=120749 >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >