From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 25 20:36:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06251106564A for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 20:36:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lattera@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA47E8FC13 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 20:36:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenq9 with SMTP id q9so5426482yen.13 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:36:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jHvaaLfDV3GXYGNnvfc5tHoVG1Ku9+8NwZ7FaU1VuhU=; b=A2dkUqUi2Vg3NgsoQ1ZccsonY9TxEntw6RDnsoRPRaAoGoy7Dpu5Pss9HVgphhaK9S ZWW3wB9z7SgNiv2HoyY+m/aoDeaTy3f8Qnba+Qr0BveMGdeP/RgHSqcbJKG6XwEjQ0N4 yJZQRf4PwZmjIjjDJGKwsXIhx6J45tZUzCk1g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.31.68 with SMTP id y4mr6991031obh.66.1322253371927; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:36:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.110.74 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:36:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8DC79843-9CF8-4C49-B871-0B0BB591B95C@4lin.net> References: <8DC79843-9CF8-4C49-B871-0B0BB591B95C@4lin.net> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:36:11 -0700 Message-ID: From: Shawn Webb To: Denny Schierz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What about network virtualization for jails? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 20:36:13 -0000 I don't really know much about how using vnet with jails will affect NFS services. I would suggest setting up a test environment before attempting anything on production servers. Please also note that my jail admin project is written mainly to fit my particular use-case, but I'll always gladly accept patches if another use-case needs to be addressed. Thanks, Shawn On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Denny Schierz wrote: > hi Shawn, > > Am 25.11.2011 um 16:54 schrieb Shawn Webb: > >> Yes. You can use VIMAGE/vnet with jails. In fact, I just blogged about >> how to set it up: >> >> http://0xfeedface.org/blog/2011-11-21/lattera/freebsd-vnet-jail-admin-pr= oject >> >> I'm also writing a php project that will help administer FreeBSD jails: >> >> https://github.com/lattera/jailadmin > > that's extremely cool :-) I will test it the next days, with our most imp= ortant services. Does the new features-set make any differences for NFS ser= ver in a jail? I want to switch from two Solaris 10 NFS =A0servers to FreeB= SD Jails. > At the moment I know only, that this is bad idea, because of kernel probl= ems. User-space NFS is also no way, to serve as NFS Server for 130 NFS =A0(= Linux) clients, booting there "/" =A0over NFS. > > cu denny > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > iEYEARECAAYFAk7P+0QACgkQKlzhkqt9P+CzswCfW76LPpnPqSYjz/UGes9CFp53 > 4MQAn1zX9jVoq+hmGwsVC809RbOhnPHW > =3DgJQG > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >