From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 8 18:28:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8550816A400 for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 18:28:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C3443D46 for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 18:28:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from localhost (monrovll-cuda1-24-53-251-44.pittpa.adelphia.net [24.53.251.44]) (AUTH: LOGIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 14:28:41 -0400 id 00056424.443800D9.00011E45 Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 14:28:40 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Matthew Seaman Message-Id: <20060408142840.18f90ba9.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <4437FBBE.8090405@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <4437FBBE.8090405@infracaninophile.co.uk> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: about sendmail security update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 18:28:43 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > In my humble opinion, sendmail is fine on almost any server not intended > to be primarily a mail server. Now, I don't want to start a pro/anti sendmail flame war, but when I read that sentence, I laughed so hard I almost choked. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com