From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Fri Oct 16 08:09:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54722A16847; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 08:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A4C1C9A; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 08:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 458A81090; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 08:09:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 08:09:56 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r399250 - in head: . devel devel/mongo-cxx-driver devel/mongo-cxx-driver/files Message-ID: <20151016080956.GA69720@FreeBSD.org> References: <201510141111.t9EBBfLS022109@repo.freebsd.org> <20151015120250.GB43539@FreeBSD.org> <20151015172213.GI1019@fc.opsec.eu> <20151015173303.GC77492@FreeBSD.org> <20151015183603.GJ1019@fc.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151015183603.GJ1019@fc.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 08:09:56 -0000 On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:36:03PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > Nonetheless, I'd kindly ask you (and everyone else reading) to do "svn > > cp" when resurrecting previously removed port, as instructed by PHB and > > common sense, thank you. > > On the one hand, you are right, we should all do it according to the books. > > On the other hand, if it makes it too tiresome with only very little > gain, why doing it ? [...] Because adhering to a higher standard (even when it seems a nuisance) is better in the long run. It disciplines people. It does not allow to bar to drop. Think of it as broken windows theory to see the point. ./danfe