From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 20 19:42:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F6F62C2 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:42:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@freebsd.org) Received: from av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (av-tac-rtp.cisco.com [64.102.19.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578BF8FC12 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:42:16 +0000 (UTC) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from chook.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBKJd7q6024276 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:39:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from rtp-jclarke-8919.cisco.com (rtp-jclarke-8919.cisco.com [10.117.46.170]) by chook.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBKJd7AJ001478; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:39:07 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <50D3695B.2060104@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:39:07 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke Organization: FreeBSD, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees Subject: Re: svn commit: r309323 - head/net/netatalk3 References: <201212201931.qBKJVIZm008054@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:42:16 -0000 On 12/20/12 2:35 PM, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 20 Dec 2012 19:31, "Joe Marcus Clarke" > wrote: >> >> Author: marcus >> Date: Thu Dec 20 19:31:18 2012 >> New Revision: 309323 >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/309323 >> >> Log: >> * Port PORTEPOCH to fix portaudit warnings (conflict with net/netatalk) > > A better solution would have been to fix the vuxml. Given that PORTNAME is the same, I went this route. I think there might have been some other oddities due to the PORTEPOCH being on netatalk, and this just puts them all to bed. Joe > > Chris > -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome