From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 11 23:07:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F095106566B; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 23:07:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (cl-414.sto-01.se.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:16d8:ff00:19d::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C8C8FC15; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 23:07:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sputnik.SpringDaemons.com (static-64-61-167-75.isp.broadviewnet.net [64.61.167.75]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 81EEF8FC27; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 02:07:55 +0300 (MSK) Received: from sputnik.SpringDaemons.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sputnik.SpringDaemons.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 14203D2B9; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:08:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:08:01 -0800 From: Stanislav Sedov To: uqs@spoerlein.net Message-Id: <20101111150801.33afa33b.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20101111145544.GH85693@acme.spoerlein.net> References: <20101110204152.GF85693@acme.spoerlein.net> <20101111145544.GH85693@acme.spoerlein.net> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-XMPP: ssedov@jabber.ru X-Voice: +7 916 849 20 23 X-PGP-Fingerprin: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581 X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org, Robert Watson Subject: Re: libkvm: consumers of kvm_getprocs for non-live kernels? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 23:07:59 -0000 On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:55:45 +0100 Ulrich Sp=C3=B6rlein mentioned: >=20 > > Stas has ongoing work on a libprocstat, you might want to give him a pi= ng.=20 > > I'm not sure if he plans to refactor some of those existing tools to us= e that=20 > > library or not, but crashdump support is a key goal of it. >=20 > Thanks for the hint, stas CC'ed and reply-to set. >=20 Yes, the idea was to refactor all base tools to use libprocstat as well. So far only procstat(8), fuser and fstat have been converted to use new functionality, = so they are able to operate both on coredumps and on the live system. We still need to commit the libprocstat itself, though. --=20 Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE