From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 20 18:58:16 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAEA8106588B;
	Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:58:16 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC90614E949;
	Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:57:36 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <503288A0.8020705@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:57:36 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:14.0) Gecko/20120728 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
References: <157941699.20120815004542@serebryakov.spb.ru>
	<CAJ-Vmon86-FPs4+XXkQXAow1jW465pMM2Sj7ZHi_0_E9VYSFSA@mail.gmail.com>
	<502AE8B5.9090106@FreeBSD.org> <502B775D.7000101@FreeBSD.org>
	<5031F636.1020405@FreeBSD.org> <50320A9E.5070303@FreeBSD.org>
	<503210A1.7010803@FreeBSD.org> <50323C5F.5090109@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <50323C5F.5090109@FreeBSD.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, lev@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a
	bottlneck?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:58:16 -0000

On 08/20/2012 06:32, Alexander Motin wrote:
> I have no plans to converge them. I've just found problem in ULE, that
> was replicated into 4BSD and it would be strange to fix one without
> another. But fixing it exposed another old problem specific to 4BSD,
> which I fixed reusing logically equivalent code from ULE. I saw no
> reason to reinvent a wheel there, same as to not fix obvious bug. Sure,
> it can change behavior in some way, but ULE is not guilty.

Thank you for that explanation.

-- 

    I am only one, but I am one.  I cannot do everything, but I can do
    something.  And I will not let what I cannot do interfere with what
    I can do.
			-- Edward Everett Hale, (1822 - 1909)