From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 17 15:36:33 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DDA4106566C
	for <questions@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:36:33 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net
	(asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7388FC19
	for <questions@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:36:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net
	[69.17.117.53])
	by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id
	6EBF3A70F3E
	for <questions@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:36:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 32448 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2012 15:36:26 -0000
Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 29209, pid: 3932, t: 0.3058s
	scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:13495
Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145])
	(envelope-sender <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>)
	by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for <questions@FreeBSD.org>; 17 Jul 2012 15:36:26 -0000
Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8])
	by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A9633C23;
	Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:36:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147)
	id 66A6D3984C; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:36:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>
To: "Reko Turja" <reko.turja@liukuma.net>
References: <EED1BC78E7CA47D38C582EAAB06DA714@Rivendell>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:36:19 -0400
In-Reply-To: <EED1BC78E7CA47D38C582EAAB06DA714@Rivendell> (Reko Turja's
	message of "Tue, 17 Jul 2012 18:19:01 +0300")
Message-ID: <44ipdm4cy4.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Ports building automatically with default options?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: questions@FreeBSD.org
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:36:33 -0000

"Reko Turja" <reko.turja@liukuma.net> writes:

> I just installed new 9.0 machine from scratch, cvsupped ports, fetched
> index and started building portupgrade. Both perl and ruby built with
> default options, without running config. No changes in port building
> steps nor workaround for this POLA violation anywhere  in the UPDATING
> etc. as far as I could see.
>
> Is there workarounds or information how to get ports building the old
> way with asking options?

The defaults haven't changed, so something must have happened locally. 
Check whether you've got BATCH defined in make.conf, and whether
/var/db/ports contains configurations for those ports.