From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 23 12:43:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4C116A514; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:43:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from leviathan.inethouston.com (leviathan.inethouston.com [209.198.171.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C90A43D31; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:43:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwcjr@inethouston.net) Received: from dwcjr (dwcjr [192.168.2.20]) by leviathan.inethouston.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DB2A82C9018; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:43:16 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <011b01c3fa4e$0786e560$1402a8c0@dwcjr> From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: "Mike Jakubik" , "'Timur I. Bakeyev'" , References: <20040223203856.460EC43D1D@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:45:53 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba* X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 20:43:26 -0000 These are issues that need to be brought up to the samba team. I'm working on updating to 3.0.2 now which may fix some of your problems. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Jakubik" To: "'Timur I. Bakeyev'" ; Cc: Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 2:38 PM Subject: RE: FreeBSD Port: samba* > I see. I ran the 3.0.x branch and I've found it to be stable for the most > part, however character conversion (needed to setup file sharing for Macs) > did not work, and neither did the vfs modules I needed. Hope the issues get > resolved soon. > > Thanks. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Timur I. Bakeyev [mailto:timur@com.bat.ru] > Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 6:42 AM > To: Mike Jakubik; dwcjr@FreeBSD.org > Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba* > > On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:12:18 -0500 > "Mike Jakubik" wrote: > >Hello, > > > > I am just wondering, but shouldn't samba be moved to samba-old and > >samba-devel to samba? It is my understanding that the latest stable > >code is 3.0.2a, and the 2.2 branch is only getting security updates. > > Well, 3.0 branch isn't yet 'stable' in the FreeBSD sence, at least. If you > take a look on a samba roadmap, they expect stability only in the 3.x series > of samba. Samba 3 is still for brave ones or for those who need new features > badly :) > > Cheers, > Timur. >