From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 7 22:04:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65AAE16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 22:04:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1870243D3F for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 22:04:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 79so4203827rnk for ; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:04:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.171.44 with SMTP id t44mr266228rne; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:04:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.75.49 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 15:04:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <790a9fff041007150420548c9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 17:04:01 -0500 From: Scot Hetzel To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Kim Culhan In-Reply-To: <790a9fff041007145872f732d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20041007210014.6141.qmail@web50705.mail.yahoo.com> <20041007212428.GA22830@parodius.com> <790a9fff041007145872f732d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: truss broken on 5.3 BETA7 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Scot Hetzel List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 22:04:20 -0000 On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 16:58:39 -0500, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 14:24:28 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick > wrote: > > /proc is not likely not mounted. I haven't seen /proc mounted in any > > of the 5.3's in awhile now. I'm not sure why, but it isn't. > > > /proc isn't mounted by default on FreeBSD-5.x for security reasons. > Most of programs that used to depend on /proc have migrated to an > alternate method. > > Truss hasn't been migrated to not use /proc. It's in the 5.3-RELEASE > TODO notes to be done before the release. > In the 5.3-RELEASE TODO it's a desired feature. So it may/may not be done for 5.3-RELEASE.