From owner-freebsd-questions  Sun Mar 30 17:10:51 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA00175
          for questions-outgoing; Sun, 30 Mar 1997 17:10:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from squirrel.tgsoft.com (squirrel.tgsoft.com [207.167.64.183])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA00160
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.com>; Sun, 30 Mar 1997 17:10:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 2547 invoked by uid 128); 31 Mar 1997 01:10:14 -0000
Date: 31 Mar 1997 01:10:14 -0000
Message-ID: <19970331011014.2546.qmail@squirrel.tgsoft.com>
From: mark thompson <thompson@squirrel.tgsoft.com>
To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.com
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSI.3.94.970330125442.242W-100000@localhost> (message from
	Doug White on Sun, 30 Mar 1997 12:56:34 -0800 (PST))
Subject: Re: cap60 port
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

   From: Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu>

   On Fri, 28 Mar 1997, mark thompson wrote:

   > It does not appear that the cap60 port uses the kernel appletalk. Is
   > this because nobody has updated the port, or because it doesn't work?

   I need to verify this, but I believe the kernel appletalk is only Phase 1,
   not the more common Phase 2.  This is the sense I get from netatalk, which
   is what the kernel hook is for.

   Please correct me if I am wrong tho.  I know that cap can use this port.

Ah. thanks. It may also be that people have gone to netatalk. I just
stumbled over it myself while looking for cap updates. 

-mark