From owner-freebsd-isp  Fri Jan 16 17:13:22 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA13678
          for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jan 1998 17:13:22 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from panda.hilink.com.au (panda.hilink.com.au [203.8.15.25])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA13655
          for <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 16 Jan 1998 17:12:42 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from danny@panda.hilink.com.au)
Received: (from danny@localhost)
	by panda.hilink.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA03291;
	Sat, 17 Jan 1998 12:12:13 +1100 (EST)
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 12:12:12 +1100 (EST)
From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au>
To: Lists <lists@mrvid.demon.co.uk>
cc: Joe Mays <jfmays@launchpad.win.net>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Distributed Webservers
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980115173926.5384F-100000@millennium.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.980117121113.29251I-100000@panda.hilink.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> 
> I don't understand why a customer would need NT unless they needed
> Frontpage extensions, which 1. are crap and 2. are available on
> UN*X anyway!
> 
> Any other reasons?

Because they want to use MS-Access/MS-SQL server/ASP/Cold Fusion

etc, etc, etc...

Danny