From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 00:59:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92B316A402 for ; Mon, 7 May 2007 00:59:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from go@go.sib-ecometall.ru) Received: from mail.sib-ecometall.ru (ns3.sib-ecometall.ru [80.255.142.109]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8760913C459 for ; Mon, 7 May 2007 00:58:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from go@go.sib-ecometall.ru) Received: from go.sib-ecometall.ru (go.local.sib-ecometall.ru [192.168.2.252]) by mail.sib-ecometall.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B51178C54 for ; Mon, 7 May 2007 08:58:57 +0800 (KRAST) Received: by go.sib-ecometall.ru (Postfix, from userid 1443) id 9B2A3FD02; Mon, 7 May 2007 08:59:09 +0800 (KRAST) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 08:59:09 +0800 From: Oleg Gritsak To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20070507005909.GA74120@go.sib-ecometall.ru> References: <463E43AD.4030105@thekeelecentre.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <463E43AD.4030105@thekeelecentre.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Subject: Re: 6.2 newfs/tunefs minfree X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 00:59:01 -0000 You should find a message written by Oliver Fromme at 26-th of April 2007, subject "Re: UFS: optimization changed". That's an answer to your question... :) (here's the link http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/archive/freebsd-stable.html) > newfs(8) manpage reports: > However, tunefs(8) manpage reports: > -m minfree > Specify the percentage of space held back from normal > users; the minimum free space threshold. The default value used is 8%. > Note that lowering the threshold can adversely affect performance: > > o Settings of 5% and less force space optimization to always be used > which will greatly increase the overhead for file writes. > > Or, am I just reading it wrong? -- системный администратор ООО "Сиб-ЭкоМеталл" тел. (3912) 609942 (144)